|
|
|
|
|
by shadowgovt
2352 days ago
|
|
I don't understand your question. If he is ostensibly anti-corruption, the rampant and obvious nepotism is counter to that goal. Unless he is simply anti-corruption that doesn't benefit him directly, in case rampant and obvious nepotism is not incompatible with his goal (but, I assume, not what voters were actually hoping for when they elected him). |
|