[loewenskind]

>it seems to me it is the naysayers who are doing that.

At most, the "naysayers" can't be any more than the perl advocates. No one is going out of their way to post articles against perl. We just come out when someone posts yet another perl advocation piece.

>Disliking something is fine, but -mentioning- it all the time seems compulsive.

Liking something is fine, but -mentioning- it all the time seems compulsive.

>And then the original commenter is talking about "back in the day,"

For all intents and purposes, perl's time has come and gone. Right or wrong, just or unjust. That's just how it is. No amount of wishing or screaming "look at this, we can also do Rails-type stuff!" will change that. Of course when someone posts yet another perl plea for relevancy, people who used it back when it was the language wax sentimental. You'd get something similar if you posted about some new project with OS2 or BEOS or something (arguably better technologies in their day then the one that ended up winning).