|
|
|
|
|
|
by TeMPOraL
2358 days ago
|
|
|
I'm arguing that the phenomena seem identical in their underlying structures. In both cases, we're dealing with a situation in which a person faces mountains of evidence that a source (a newspaper, or scientific papers in a given field) keeps pumping out inaccurate or wrong publications, but despite all that evidence, they assume that whatever isn't explicitly pointed out as wrong must be 100% true, accurate and honest. |
|
|