Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dreary_dugong 2366 days ago
As stated in a thread above, while it is not directly profitable for drug companies to cure diseases, it is profitable for their insurance agency cohorts. The current system does not totally dis-incentivize cures.
1 comments

The problem is that those drugs never even make it into the pipeline because they don't get investment in the first place. The big drug companies aren't the ones actually developing new drugs; that's done by biotech startups. If a drug shows promise, big pharma buys the company and pays for stage 2+ clinical trials.

A friend of mine works in pharmaceutical marketing, and the big revelation I got from him was that the marketing departments run the drug companies from the top to the bottom. If marketing doesn't see a billion dollar market for a new drug, it won't even be considered for clinical trials. The VC in biotech knows this, so they won't fund startups that don't have this potential.

There was a HN thread on this recently in relation to antibiotics. [1] Antibiotics are a special case for their own reasons, but ultimately if the potential for insane windfalls isn't there, big pharma is not interested.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21782994