|
|
|
|
|
by nordsieck
2359 days ago
|
|
> Feel free to peruse the documentation and point out which parts seem unbelievable. The system is currently live and I hold a Dai Savings Account and can attest I've been paid according to the system's documentation. The problem with bad financial instruments is not that they don't work at all, but that they work fine for a period of time and then blow up. I think the point your parent was trying to make is that the long term interest rate of any security has an upper bound of the growth rate of the economy. I don't know of anyone who things the US economy has a real growth rate of 6%. |
|
This is incorrect. Economists won't need it explained, but you're probably not one. Think about it like this - the growth of the economy is a weighted average of the growth of many different assets. By definition, a few of them will have higher rates of growth a few will have lower rates of growth.
What you should've said is that the higher rate ones are typically higher risk. So at the lowest possible risk, you probably cap out at the economic growth rate (also not a truism, but somewhat closer).