|
|
|
|
|
|
by whatshisface
2359 days ago
|
|
|
If the scientist was wrong, he was wrong for reasons that were more subtle and complicated than the objections the author thought of. A better option would be to have organized a debate between two scientists who were both already experts. There's also a difference between skepticism and unfriendliness: the author came across as unfriendly, while a scientist who could not be so easily knocked back might have been able to keep it to skepticism. |
|
|
oh you mean like aliens not existing and the guy getting really excited over a space rock?