|
|
|
|
|
|
by neilobremski
2366 days ago
|
|
|
I'll agree with the point that "version numbers are useless to the end user" except when there's an incompatibility. To that end, I'd prefer release tracks to be indicated in the TITLE and breaking (API) changes in the VERSION. Any other number in the version is essentially irrelevant. Then again perhaps in web apps there's something to be said for this when breaking changes ARE the consistency. I have to say that working in back-end technology, I don't really care whether something was built in 2010 or 2020 as long as it's doing its job well. Unfortunately, most back-end technology still communicates with web API's at some point and then we're at the mercy of the service's "version". |
|
|