Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stickfigure 2365 days ago
Generally speaking, the longer the half-life, the less dangerous (in terms of radioactivity) something is. Also, pl239 primarily emits alpha particles, which are stopped by clothing and don't penetrate skin. Maybe a real physicist can chime in, but I don't think there's much risk of standing around subcritical quantities of the stuff.

The chemical toxicity is a different matter though.

2 comments

Direct from Wikipedia:

As an alpha emitter, plutonium-239 is not particularly dangerous as an external radiation source, but if it is ingested or breathed in as dust it is very dangerous and carcinogenic. It has been estimated that a pound (454 grams) of plutonium inhaled as plutonium oxide dust could give cancer to two million people. However, ingested plutonium is by far less dangerous as only a tiny fraction is absorbed in gastrointestinal tract. 800 mg would be unlikely to cause a major health risk as far as radiation is concerned. As a heavy metal, plutonium is also toxic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium#Precautions

Fascinating, I don't have a lot of knowledge around the subject. Thank you for the new perspective.