[cam_l]

The refusal to use back burning / fuel reduction has been fairly widely reported and also very thoroughly refuted. But if all you read is country newspapers or the Australian (or worse) you may be forgiven for thinking those damn greenies are to blame.

The truth of the matter is back burning (controlled burning in the path of the fire to stop it's spread) is very much still used when it is safe. The issue is the strong hot winds have meant several of these efforts have gotten out of control. Fuel reduction burning has been increased substantially in the last decade but the climate conditions mean the areas needed for fuel reduction are widening at a greater rate and the windows of safe burning are closing down.

Chalking it up to climate change is what most of the volunteers are doing. Saying otherwise is disrespectful, disingenuous and highly political.