So... you're upset about people who don't read the source. But you're also upset that the OP didn't provide a summary so that you could avoid reading the source?
I clicked through. Source material is about 200 pages.
Linking to a news article is one thing.
Linking to basically a book, without so much as saying why the book is good, is another.
I didn't say it was bad. Just asked the OP, why submit this? What's interesting in it? If I find the summary interesting, I read further. I also mentioned that when posting 200 pages without so much as a summary, most people won't read, leaving the less intelligent 'title commentators' (something I think is discouraged in this forum, which is why I participate)
Linking to a news article is one thing.
Linking to basically a book, without so much as saying why the book is good, is another.
I didn't say it was bad. Just asked the OP, why submit this? What's interesting in it? If I find the summary interesting, I read further. I also mentioned that when posting 200 pages without so much as a summary, most people won't read, leaving the less intelligent 'title commentators' (something I think is discouraged in this forum, which is why I participate)