[grecy]

> Then it would be up to a competent attorney to sue the arresting officer under 42 usc 1983 civil actions for deprivations of rights. The law provided for reasonable attorney fees to be paid by a defendant who violated your civil rights

So you somehow feel better about your rights being deprived because "sue everyone". In the mean time the authorities have effectively shut down the protest, that was perfectly legal. But they stopped it anyway. So it achieved nothing, and the 'right to assemble' is a myth.

> The nice thing is that even though your suing the officer who violated your civil rights they are usually covered by an insurance policy so it's technically not an asset poor officer paying the judgement

Ah, the true American dream. Sue someone for a ton of money, and you don't even have to feel bad about it because it's not even their money!

[dang]

Please don't post nationalistic flamebait to HN. It leads to flamewars. We don't want those here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ajmurmann]

You forgot the part where it's not only not their money, but in fact our money.

How public officials get "punished" is one of my biggest issues. We are right now holding them to a lower standard whereas we should hold them to a much higher standard. If a public official, especially in law enforcement, commits a crime it's a much bigger problem because it undermined the entire system beyond just the crime itself. This should result in draconic punishments for even small crimes.

[lawlessquestion]

That's the point. We pay, it should anger us, so we hold the authorities to accountability

[lawlessquestion]

Better that then the successful plaintiff being left holding the bag when their civil rights are horrifically violated. Excessive force cases can and do result in death and disability not including whatever mental trauma. Better the people that the state that employs law enforcement bear the cost associated with their actions, then victims of civil rights violations are unable to collect against a bankrupt defendant.

[mistermann]

Any comment on the "In the mean time the authorities have effectively shut down the protest, that was perfectly legal" aspect?