|
|
|
|
|
by josuepeq
2369 days ago
|
|
Currently paying $4200 for a 3 Bedroom 3 Bath fully detached single family house West of Twin Peaks (Midtown Terrace.) Giving up walkability for completing errands, I gain a private locking front porch where packages are never stolen, and lots of mold from living on fog laden Twin Peaks. On the whole, San Francisco is fairly damp; ensuring good ventilation is key - along with weekly maintenance to alleviate mold and keep things “clean.” I don’t expect to have everything done for me either; there’s lots of un-fun tasks to complete around here. While deferred maintenance issues are a landlord’s responsibility to correct; the tenants could have taken a more proactive approach to remediation of the mold; or any other nonissue complaint lodged against San Francisco. As a QA Engineer, I have an unfair advantage when it comes to understanding the need to mitigate risk. Seems this couple makes decisions without any regard to future consequences. 1. Didn’t mention whether or not they discussed the condition of the property with the current tenants in the building or any neighbors prior to signing the lease.
2. Clearly no understanding of tenant rights and responsibilities; would have known that rent can be withheld for fixing things.
3. Didn’t get mold coverage riders on renters insurance; yet has lived in a damp city for much of their lives.
4. Orders packages to an apartment without any way to safely store them; taking into account any/all edge cases
5. Didn’t do homework / ask questions to landlord regarding package delivery best practices for tenants back before lease signed in ‘15.
6. Didn’t see if other alternatives existed for broken doorbell.
7. Cancels health insurance because they couldn’t help with costs from the mold situation; forgets that a multitude of other accidents, trauma, and sickness still occur in the present and future. All of their complaints seem to come back to being unprepared for handling problems that appear in life. |
|