|
|
|
|
|
by inferiorhuman
2366 days ago
|
|
Whatever you read about that is simply wrong. (I've seen a LOT of misinformation in popular print about this.) You're correct that the hand cranks were unusable. But the electric thumb switches WERE usable and were pointed out in the AD. And if you enable the electric trim switches on a 737 MAX you get MCAS activation. MCAS, of course, trims faster than the switches. Using the electric switches is fighting a losing battle (look at the graphs of trim input vs output). How are you supposed to fly the plane when you can't trim the stabilizer? Look at the graphs from the Indonesian report. The pilots were countering with trim up button presses and MCAS still managed to take the trim to a severe AND position. Look at the graphs from the Ethiopian report. You'll see a long gap where the electric trim was disabled (leaving the pilots with no way to trim the stabilizer). Outside that gap you'll see an automatic (MCAS) AND command with no change in trim and a couple ANU clicks from the pilots with no resulting change in trim. No guessing required. Follow the training, which is supposed to be a "memory item", meaning they weren't supposed to need to consult a checklist nor dig through anything nor guess. And what memory items were they supposed to have in mind? Keeping in mind MCAS presented counter to how Boeing defines runaway trim. |
|
The electric trim switches override MCAS. That is why the steps are:
1. use the electric trim switches to set the trim to normal
2. cut off the electric trim
That's all there is to it.
> MCAS presented counter to how Boeing defines runaway trim.
That's simply false. (And runaway trim does not need definition, Boeing does not define it.)