|
|
|
|
|
|
by charlesism
2369 days ago
|
|
|
Why isn’t the Schrödinger's cat thing sufficient? I don’t know much about quantum physics, but if we find situations where matter has odds of behaving a certain way, that seems like evidence. How do we explain events not always having a predictable outcome unless all possible outcomes occur somewhere? |
|
|
I think the leap from A to B is unnecessary. "We don't know" is also an acceptable answer.