|
|
|
|
|
by ZeroCool2u
2364 days ago
|
|
Hey Drew, I'm a huge fan and have a lot of respect for your work. I feel like I see the pattern of people on HN being disappointed in some of the tools that come out of Google and other large engineering orgs, when they don't work out really well in orgs that are not operating at the same scale. People have similar complaints about the complexity of other projects that come out of Google. K8s comes to mind as one such example. Often times these tools must be robust to such a large variety of uses that they are simply overkill for smaller organizations. I'll readily admit that I could be wrong and Bazel is simply poorly designed, but it is perhaps worth considering that the build system used by an engineering team of 50 need not be as complex as the build system used by one of the largest engineering orgs in the world. My guess is we'd see a lot less backlash if people tried to step off the hype train for a moment and critically evaluate whether they really need to use something like Bazel or K8s when something simpler would suffice. |
|
> Build and test software of any size, quickly and reliably
Given the comments here, a tagline focusing on its strengths for large orgs/projects probably would be better marketing.