|
|
|
|
|
by the_af
2370 days ago
|
|
> "[Lisp and] Haskell don't produce very efficient code (or make it hard to produce efficient code)." Curious here. Are you speaking from experience -- i.e. you tried and failed -- or is this simply something you guess must be true? People write high-performance software in Haskell, and it's their tool of choice. |
|
I've heard of those but have never managed to see one. Do you have some examples ? (to give you my "baseline" - handling >500k messages/second on a desktop cpu for instance as this is something quite easily achievable in C++)