[tucaz]

I like how you are stating your opinions in a respectful way. Thank you for that.

For part of my opinion see my response below.

As for the other part, I just say that it is naive to expect “someone” to fix the worlds problems. No government or authority can fix it.

If the two fisherman can’t get in an agreement for the greater good and they both die, so be it.

What we can’t do is use apparently good excuses that will hurt and kill millions of people for the “greater good”.

When we demand that countries lower their emissions what we are doing is forcing them in poverty, hunger and death.

The world is not made by super advanced countries like US or European ones.

For people fighting for food on a daily basis these kinds of demands are simply not achievable.

[pjc50]

> If the two fisherman can’t get in an agreement for the greater good and they both die, so be it.

Literally this is what the EU fish quota fixes - although in that case it's the risk of the fish dying out.

> When we demand that countries lower their emissions what we are doing is forcing them in poverty, hunger and death.

Not reducing emissions also does that in many cases. Large areas of Bangladesh are predicted to be physically underwater, for example.

[michaelmrose]

There is enough of everything including food for all the world. If not killing the planet requires a transfer of wealth so that foreigners can both eat and help us achieve our goals I don't see why this would be an extreme barrier.