[aSplash0fDerp]

From a laymens POV, it seems like half of the equation would represent the energy used in the bonds of each molecule representing smoothness (almost moving as a solid), with the other half laying out a dynamic list of finite variables that disrupt or exceed the energy forming the bonds.

Its almost like they would have to define a theoretic limit similar to 9.808175174 m/s^2 to limit the finite possibilities of outside forces acting on the molecules before the molecules themselves become the outside force, with those that exceed the limits be classified with a custom equation, and those below the threshold fitting nicely in a bow wrapped package.

And just to add more SWAG, is it going to be easier to produce these finding/understandings in space, where theoretic limits are more well defined and we'll be forced to use custom equations within our atmosphere looking for an answer from a perspective that is environmentally more complex?

Its all greek to me...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equati...

[aSplash0fDerp]

OK. I was thinking more of a Newtons apple moment in space, where someone with a syringe and fluid may make an elegant observation on blow-up or collapse.

Eddys in a river with more eddys creating eddys is a dizzying theory though.