[MS90]

Do it wrong and the life support systems for you and your friends up there go out and you all die. Also, this entire $150,000,000,000 international investment may lose guidance and altitude control and burn up in the atmosphere, or maybe even rain down debris on some unlucky city.

No pressure!

[ChuckNorris89]

Iirc, mission critical aerospace computers have triple redundancy since like ... forever.

So I can't believe the ISS computer doesn't have some sort of redundancy in place to prevent a catastrophe when there's so much money and lives at stake.

But I liked your joke.

[reportgunner]

Yeah the point of this article is to say that they had no spare parts anymore since the machine is 20 years old.

Someone got an idea that they could manufacture the old missing parts (using new manufacturing process) and now they did and it works.

[hvidgaard]

Did you read the article? If you did you'd know that they run two computers. If one fail, a third automatically activates and the faulty is disabled. They also keep a fourth to swap out the failed one.

But it still doesn't change the fact that swapping out with a completely new specification can have unintended consequences. They waited until a computer failed to swap, so if it did not work, they'd run at reduced redundancy.

[tonyedgecombe]

Did you read the article?

From the HN guidelines:

Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."