That was already mentioned in the article - you turn them off. Short of that, no, you’ll have to have headlights that direct themselves away from cars.
You could also have some auto-tint on windshields, or drive using some advanced heads up display instead of using your vision directly.
Sorry, I don't completely follow. What was mentioned? That there are no simpler solutions to blinding headlights?
The article is very positive about these complex headlights - the only negative mentioned is the price.
I, on the other hand, am quite doubtful about them. There is so much you have to get right to have them run consistently. Such a complex piece of equipment is more likely to break or go wrong in some way, or e.g. perhaps misjudge the wrong thing as being a car and so switch off at an inappropriate time. Is there a manual override, at least?
GPS that takes into account road curvature? That doesn't sound sufficiently fast and accurate.
I'll admit I am ignorant of the tech. It is entirely possible this has all been taken into account, and it works well, and the risk/benefit does work out. Otherwise they probably wouldn't be rolling it out.
My experience with complex computerised systems and software, including in cars, leads me to be distrustful. And there are innumerable instances of advanced technological systems being peddled where the good old fashioned manual way just works better. I say this not as an old Luddite, but as a relatively young software developer.
But hey, reliable software can be built, and has shown itself to be useful in many instances.
I'd need to do more investigation to come to a proper conclusion, but my first instinct is to be doubtful.
EDIT: They don't need to work perfectly. The main question is just, do they work better than humans on average and when it's important?
You could also have some auto-tint on windshields, or drive using some advanced heads up display instead of using your vision directly.