[JohnFen]

I mostly agree. It is distinctly marketing-flavored, although not to a degree that I think should disqualify it alone.

What I think should disqualify it is that it's missing a lot of detail that would make the entry genuinely useful. As it is, it's as useful as a press release. Also, it does appear to have a problem with appropriate references.

Generally speaking, I have a hard time disagreeing with the reasons listed on that page for the rejections.