[duskwuff]

> I’m wondering if Wikipedia can continue to be considered a reliable source of information for technical folks who want to learn more about the vast system of Apache open source software projects.

I'm confused why the writer thinks it should be!

The Apache Foundation is a big tent. There's some clearly notable projects in there (like Apache httpd), but there's also a lot of really obscure crap that basically nobody outside ASF cares about (like Apache Creadur or Apache Pony Mail). Expecting Wikipedia to document every Apache project is ridiculous.

Is this particular project notable enough for a Wikipedia article? I don't know a lot about it, so I can't say for sure. But the article drafts that I've seen don't convince me that it is.

[lallysingh]

> Expecting Wikipedia to document every Apache project is ridiculous.

Wikipedia has a lot of rather obscure entries. Long, long lists that I think easily under-rank the Apache project.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but the bar for notability is kinda vague. Lists of every episode of a series, every kind of kim-chee, etc.

[Semiapies]

I would have said Wikipedia is a questionable source on "open source software projects", period.

The idea that Apache software projects are too obscure to include, while every single individual episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer has a detailed article, is pretty typical of the site.