|
|
|
|
|
|
by SilasX
2379 days ago
|
|
|
>I don't see how anything you said is an argument that cumulative liquidity is an appropriate measure here. I agreed that accumulating the entire amount is also the wrong way to account for it (but was pointing out that the daily amount is also an error in the other direction): >>even if it's not as bad as him having a $50 shortfall (esp since he does pay you back). |
|
|