[QuiXotical1]

Also when it comes to hyper partisan issues I’m honestly not confident that information can be smoothed out to arrive at something resembling the truth. If anything I would expect those topics to become an amalgamation of facts which are easily interpreted in any way. “Person says X” well obviously it means “A” but 2 sentences later says “Y” so obviously means “B” then in the context of the whole paragraph the meaning is clearly “C” but because of the climate around that time the implication could mean “D” or oppositely “E”.

Basically anything political can be manipulated and twisted to suit whatever ideology a group favors while never misquoting or distorting “facts”. I’m not sure you can ever smooth out bias, and depending on the issue, if one group is more active than the other, it’s just an information and effort war for who can monopolize the page.. and then that’s nothing to say about those who review and decide what edits are more correct/valid. But eh, oh well.