|
|
|
|
|
by seriesf
2376 days ago
|
|
I'm sorry but there is no way your characterization is accurate for any given point on the map. The entire Los Angeles metropolitan statistical area only authorizes about 2500 new dwellings per month, and not all of them get built. Prior to 1990, the rate was normally above 5000 dwellings per month. This is despite the fact that Greater LA has grown more than 22% in population since 1990. So, my point stands. The only people who believe this is a boom haven't looked at this graph: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LOSA106BPPRIVSA |
|
Down the street are two new apartment buildings which house another 1000-1500 people.
Two blocks away from that are a cluster of apartment buildings which collectively house more than 10,000 people.
And quite frankly, you are simply wrong about the statistics you are citing.
The pre-1990 figure is primarily residential single-family homes, so each structure was on average capable of housing just 4 people. Current residential construction is primarily multi-unit residences, so each structure represents residential capacity, on average, of several dozen people.
So my point stands, and I would strongly recommend you take a statistics course.