Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Danieru 2380 days ago
Oh wow, I would not want 2000w going through Ethernet. Both for the obvious electrical issues, and for the dangerous mixing of safe sockets and hot sockets.

No idea how this would be more efficient. Bursting voltage will lead to higher loses versus a continuous voltage. Are they claiming efficiency thanks to a centralized AC->DC converter?

1 comments

Cat5 doesn't imply RJ45, so that confusion could be easily averted if people with brains developed that stuff. 2000w constant power transmission on a Cat5 sounds dubious, though. I don't know at what the voltage such a cable gives in and shorts wires. It would have to be pretty high to get the current to something the wire crossection can handle.
It's not the wattage that is going the be the problem, but either the high current or the high voltage (arcing).