|
|
|
|
|
by Arbalest
2383 days ago
|
|
I'm going to wager the answer is, no. By and large, the main advantage of GPS is it is now extremely compact and relatively low power. My gut feel: To do the same with the sun and stars, you need very finely calibrated optical instruments, probably on a motion compensated surface to get maybe 1/10th of the precision. Also a precise timesource would need to be thermally compensated etc. That's not portable or low power and I don't really see how portable that can be made. The inertia + gyros thing is already used by GPS systems as a backup when traveling in tunnels. |
|