|
|
|
|
|
|
by A_Parr
2380 days ago
|
|
|
1: They threw out the 120 year number since it was reported differently for humans than it was the rest of the animals in the data set. Those numbers would have been the average of the 10% of the eldest members in the study, while 120 is the maximum reportedly seen in humans. 2: You're thinking of life expectancy instead of lifespan for the last part. |
|
|