|
|
|
|
|
by stewbrew
2381 days ago
|
|
"Hundreds" is as an exageration. You make it sound as if libraries in other languages were bug free. In my experience, most libraries work well and most authors respond rather quickly to requests. Anyway, I think it's better to make use of a small, commonly used, and well tested library instead of reinventing the wheel again and again. Libraries are not one of my concerns I have with R. |
|
now what if I told you that the majority (perhaps all) of these libraries you loaded and are needed to run the complex analyses in life sciences were all developed by people who are oblivious to proper software engineering. These were never meant to be used the way they are used - expose myriad of global variable names, methods etc.
You say you are using a small well-tested library with R, sure - but that is not what happens in science and for those that see what is going on, we know we're completely FKDd
The tragedy is that we cannot cure cancer as long we try to do it with R - and R is not going anywhere ...