| > if you want to have really structured and semi-reliable information you will probably have to rely, at some point, on something like Wikipedia meta-information (DBpedia). Wikidata is also worth considering for that task. It is: * Directly linked from Wikipedia [1] * The data source for many infoboxes [2] * Seeded with data from Wikipedia * More active and integrated in community * Larger in total number of concepts Wikidata also has initiatives in lexicographic data [3] and images [4, 5]. On the subject of Cyc: the CycL "generalization" (#$genls) predicate inspired Wikidata's "subclass of" property [6], which now links together Wikidata's tree of knowledge. --- 1. See "Wikidata" link at left in all articles, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_base 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Infobox_templates_usi... 3. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data/... 4. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikimedia_Commons/Dev... 5. See "Structured data" tab in image details on Wikimedia Commons, e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mona_Lisa,_by_Leonar... 6. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P279#Archived_cr... |
