[caycep]

Just out of curiosity (and this goes into the subject of open source project dynamics of which I am really just a lay observer, and as someone who hasn't followed the history of either projects closely) - how is vim vs neovim organized as open source projects? Do both have a healthy ecosystem of contributor/maintaners? Are either in danger of running into "single person syndrome" or "hit-by-a-bus" syndrome?

[oblio]

Neovim was started pretty explicitly to be a community project. There's a main maintainer but there's no BDFL. Vim has Bram as BDFL.

I'd say that for (Neo)Vim, which is a mature project with a clear design, the BDFL approach is ok but there are risks, illustrated by the half decade where Vim stagnated. Neovim has a less risky approach to project management, I'd say.

Of course, we need to revisit this topic in a decade or so :-)

[pletnes]

I thought vim always was a «BDFL project», i.e. run by one person.

[earenndil]

Run by one person doesn't mean developed by one person.