|
|
|
|
|
|
by dev-il
2377 days ago
|
|
|
> You realize that Qt is dual licensed what part of the thread did you not read? We've covered that already: the other option is the closed commercial license which since the switch from Nokia to QTCOM has become exorbitantly expensive > Nobody cares about license cost of Qt (…) We don't use LGPLv3 in Qt. We buy commercial license. You sound like you work in Qt Marketing, not in embedded. > It's quite low compared to everything else That's rather ridiculous. Most alternatives cost zero. |
|
|