[ble52]

Am I the only one who sees all these Electrons, React Natives, Flutters, etc. as mostly middle-management-pleasing technologies made for crunching cookie-cutter apps with the least amount of outsourced developers as possible?

Whenever I see Slack, Spotify, VS Code, or any other "universal" app, it always strikes me as a completely out of place it looks and behaves, no matter what OS it's running on. Yes, it's relatively easy to make a multiplatform app with these technologies, ticking all the boxes specified by bean-counters, but in the process it usually completely sacrifices all the little details, integrations, patterns, etc. that make platform-specific apps such a pleasure to use. If you're used to apps behaving in a predictable manner, e.g. having similar shortcuts, similar icons having the same meaning (and other way round - similar actions having the same icon), then e.g. seeing a Material Design on macOS is just weird and looks completely out-of-place, not mentioning event UX aspects.

I know it's hard to quantify this in an Excel spreadsheet, but in my opinion following interface guidelines of the target platform and properly using its native technologies makes for a much better user experience (I'm talking here about the basic meaning of this phrase). For example, just look at Google Docs app for iPad - for sure it's written using some Google's weird "universal" technology, but every time Apple announces new iOS (now iPadOS) features, like split screen, multiple windows, etc. it taks Google months to provide support for them. At the same time, developers that follow Apple's guidelines and recommendation, they usually get these features in their apps "for free" or with relatively small amounts of work required.

I'm simplifying the whole situation here, of course, but I think trend of making all apps in Flutter et al. might be good for some people, but end-users are usually not one of them.

[LocalPCGuy]

Using Flutter has been extremely helpful for us in a startup environment, getting apps built for both iOS and Android in half the time (or less) compared to doing both. Our team has plenty of native mobile experience and has built separate native apps that mirror functionality in the past.

Flutter was so much more efficient, it actually lives up to the promise of write-once, build to multiple platforms.

As for design, we have a very custom design and in Flutter you are in no way locked into Material design.

[erokar]

I don't think the majority of end users care much. They have gotten used to web apps more than anything, a unified web-like UI across platforms might even been seen as a positive by them.