|
|
|
|
|
|
by gerbilly
2378 days ago
|
|
|
The integrity of my rubik's cube analogy isn't critical to my argument, but... Even allowing for equivalent rotations as you mention, the method humans use to unscramble a rubik's cube is far far from optimal because we can't grok a scrambled rubik's cube then just execute the optimal solution. Also this is just pedantry because WLOG you could just name those equivalent 180 rotations as a single operation anyway. |
|
|
That isnt true insofar as there are decisions that are based on arbitrary perception and categorization. What you could do is irrelevant because that is an assumption to create a generalization. GL with whatever.