|
|
|
|
|
by scurvy
2382 days ago
|
|
You're both right. It's an older term from the early 90's when a router's selling point was being able to hit "line rate" with the smallest possible packet size. Example, how many tiny datagrams can you forward to fill that link. Back then, people were still doing lots of routing on general purpose machines and Cisco/Juniper were just starting to get into the high performance game. These days line-rate just means sending enough traffic to fill the link at whatever rate you want. That's generally good enough for server folk since they just want to get you the cat pics ASAP. That's not good enough for people running transit networks, since they care more about packets per second performance. Sending huge amounts of data is easy for them; what they really care about is PPS. Aside, the next generations of router NPU's are trash in terms of PPS performance. I take that back, they're not trash. They're the trash in the dumpsterfire. That's how bad they are. We're fairly screwed there. My guess is GoDaddy was looking at increased PPS performance either for DNS or maybe building their own DDoS mitigation framework (Arbor gear is pricey). |
|