[numbol]

Sorry for bad english, and maybe I am deeply wrong, but:

In extreme cases, it even not "photo" as some information about photons recieved by some optic system with noise reduction afterwards. Not, it just pictures, based on recognised faces, objects and stars. And I don't know why, but I feel panifully bad about it. It is not approximation of world-how-it-is, but some expectation about world-how-people-want-it. It can recognise constellation based on few stars, and will draw nice picture of great stary sky, but will delete starlink sattelite, meteora or supernova as some unexpected noise.

[GuB-42]

You can think of these enhanced pictures as an artistic interpretation. Like a robot painter drawing your portrait. That's not a bad thing, good artists, and most likely good robots know how to make something look good while preserving the essentials. Unless I am doing astronomy, I'd rather have a beautiful night sky than a speck of dust that might be a starlink satellite. And if I am doing astronomy, having all the super-resolution features is really nice.

Unprocessed camera modes will continue to exist for people who want that. Maybe with some built-in digital signature in case it is used as proof.

Photography, and earlier that that, drawing, has always been world-how-people-want-it. Accuracy is just one of the things you may want.