|
|
|
|
|
by taylodl
2383 days ago
|
|
"there were other times when my PR was outright rejected as it did not meet the required standards" Are these standards published? If not then how are you expected to meet "required standards" that are not published? If so then why are you not reviewing your code yourself prior to the PR? Is training and/or mentorship provided for you to come up to speed with the required standards? Something seems off about this situation. |
|
I've worked in at least two teams where there were those non-written "standards" which one learned only after a few lengthy code reviews.
Usually a sign of people trying to cargo-cult themselves to good code.
At least one time it was simply a case of gatekeeping so that other developers wouldn't threaten that person's position.