|
|
|
|
|
by raverbashing
2378 days ago
|
|
> between minimally invasive vs weeks of recuperation and pain This is an important aspect. Is the study considering the mortality of the surgery itself? It seems so, but nonetheless it is not a simple procedure. Second potential bias is possibly how many patients continued with "bad behaviours" after the surgery vs. the stent. |
|
My understanding is that open heart surgical intervention is much more effective at inducing behavior change.
If so, what does that imply that cardiologists should recommend? Should a more invasive procedure be used, simply for the fact it is more invasive? Should the stenting procedure be made more painful?