|
|
|
|
|
by StavrosK
5618 days ago
|
|
I get horrible CPU usage as well. It's to be expected, I guess, since they have to encrypt data, but what is the encryption code written in, Python? Also, it's slow to update things. You wouldn't expect this, given that Linux has inotify, but it is. Their support is rather bad, I've emailed them about legitimate bugs and high CPU usage and SpiderOak not syncing and a whole lot of things, but they never credited me anything. I decided to buy it for a year to back my photos up because my disk is making weird noises and it took them three days to reply to my "PayPal won't let me pay from my balance and I don't want to add a credit card" email, to tell me to add a credit card. I replied "yes, I don't want to add a credit card", and they haven't replied since I sent it three days ago. With that sales support, I wonder how they sell any copies. |
|
For inotify, the biggest limitation we run into on Linux is that the default system configuration limits a user to watching a relatively small number of folders (6,000 I think, and that includes all subfolders recursively.) You can change this in sysctl if you like, and we may add this change to future packages. In case your curious, the SpiderOak directory watchers are tiny C programs for each platform, and are open source.
FYI -- We've definitely seen high CPU use when syncing hundreds of thousands of small files (source code etc), but this has been greatly improved in the latest beta, which just went out yesterday.
Thanks very much for the feedback.