[mstipetic]

I live in a very large city in Europe. I think the number of stars you can see is less than 20. Ground based pollution is horrible, I don't know how you can compare those two.

[greglindahl]

If you go back 100 years, you could see stars great from the middle of your very large city in Europe. Then the lights came, one by one.

This process is just starting with satellites. Can you see the connection now?

[iudqnolq]

Maybe because large telescopes aren't in very large cities.

[Reason077]

Here’s an example of a large telescope in a very large city:

https://www.rmg.co.uk/discover/explore/great-equatorial-tele...

[greglindahl]

100 years ago, lots of them were.

[iudqnolq]

Kind of. Some on mountains near cities, but even then light polution was an issue they had to mitigate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_optical_telesc...

In general, I'm fine with scientists needing to accommodate people more than they had to 100 years ago.

[greglindahl]

That list of telescopes only goes back to 1932, and I studied astronomy at one of the institutions in question.

As an example, why is this area named Observatory Hill? https://www.google.com/maps/place/Observatory+Hill,+Cambridg...

> In general, I'm fine with scie!tists needing to accommodate people more than they had to 100 years ago.

Indeed, that's the majority opinion.

[iudqnolq]

You're right, not quite 100 years.

[greglindahl]

... it's named Observatory Hill, in the middle of Cambridge Massachusetts, quite near to downtown Boston, because it has an observatory that used to work great before light pollution.