|
|
|
|
|
by erincandescent
2383 days ago
|
|
It's baked into various systems, protocols and conventions? Sweden and other EU countries which didn't adopt the Euro also retain their traditional account numbering systems A part of the Eurozone transition was that all local systems were replaced by SEPA SCT/SDD, which are inherently IBAN based. But SCT/SDD only apply to Euro transfers, and so in non-eurozone locales the existing infrastructure and nomenclature is retained > Japan has the same system of sort/branch codes and account number, but when I enter those here the recipient name is automatically filled out, making incorrect transfers pretty much impossible (unless, I guess, your mis-entered transfer to Mr. Sato is transferred to a different Mr. Sato instead) There is a Confirmation of Payee system coming soon in the UK (which most of the large banks have, unfortunately, delayed). It works slightly differently: it will compare the name, but not _generally_ tell you the name of the recipient because that comes with privacy concerns |
|
These could be compatible though. e.g. in Poland numbers used for local bank transfers are just IBANs with country code trimmed from the front.