[krzepah]

I think you are jumping on his words and not taking his statement to their true meaning. Are you telling on the opposite side that someone publicly announcing false information that could harm someone should not be responsible for it?

You are the one who's making me afraid.

[username90]

Intent matters here, and anti-vaxxers spread this information because they believe they will help the kids. Scientists are often wrong. Probably less often than other people, and probably not in the case of vaccines, but it is dumb to make it illegal in general to say things scientists disagree with.

And yes, scientists say that kids die without vaccines, some people disagree, so you would actually punish them for disagreeing with scientists since otherwise you wouldn't be sure these people killed kids.

[krzepah]

I understand that the debate is complicated and I'm actually not into the vaxx debate itself so I don't have to take a judgment. However, I'm happy to see you are underlying the intent point which I completely agree to and I've been poorly trying to defend.