|
|
|
|
|
|
by asdfman123
2388 days ago
|
|
|
If you're arguing for something you need the full argument. Not everyone is starting with the assumption that Google is bad. I know Google isn't a completely benign force in the universe but I haven't been properly convinced I should boycott them. |
|
|
No you don't. In fact, for many rhetorically primed things, such as opposition to Google, and especially in the realm of activism, explaining over and over why you're doing a thing is often not done because it's not necessary.
Every environmental protest doesn't need to include explanations of the Exxon Valdez and BP's Deepwater Horizon. Once things reach a certain level of cultural "it is known" explaining over and over is not required. If you're attending a protest, you know about these things. If you don't, others at the protest will tell you. If you do and aren't convinced, they aren't interested in reaching you.