|
|
|
|
|
by curryst
2391 days ago
|
|
Recognizing that also welcomes comparisons along other boundaries. Some racial minorities are over-represented in violent crime statistics. Without delving into biases potentially present in both your statistic and those, what would be the fundamental difference between allowing riders to filter by gender and allowing them to filter by race? Your argument seems like a justification for both. I also don't know that sexual assault is the reason for segregated bathrooms and locker rooms. I was always under the impression that it was just a puritanical artifact from an older time. Unified bathrooms are becoming more popular; I am curious if that has had any impact on sexual assault rates. |
|
The fundamental difference between filtering by race and filtering by gender is that one is by race and one is by gender. They’re not the same thing, and we don’t need to pretend that they are.
Separate bathrooms is most certainly not related to the Puritans, as we can observe equal or more bathroom separation across almost all religions and in all countries.
I don’t even think unified bathrooms are really becoming more popular outside the relatively small bubble that has been influenced by trans-activism. Even then, most of them are for a single occupant, which doesn’t really count, but satisfies everyone.