Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by chasil 2388 days ago
I do not agree.

Apple could play the go-between. They could alert the previous owner that the device has been found, and provide a grace period where a user could request return, for a fee, including Apple's S&H, and a finders' fee for the reporting agent.

At the expiration of the grace period, Apple could provide a device reset code.
2 comments
llampx 2387 days ago
I fail to see why Apple would do this. Is this going to bring them more money?
link
rootusrootus 2387 days ago
If they did it, it would probably need to be accounted for as a form of goodwill.
link
Gorbzel 2387 days ago
Why is Apple required to act as law enforcement? Moreso, even if they could, why as consumers and technicians should we want them to?

HNers go on and on about big brother Cupertino all the time, but ooh some (well intentioned but misguided) refurb/recycling shop writes an article and all of a sudden critical thinking goes out the window.

link
lonelappde 2387 days ago
Apple is inserting itself as law enforcement. That's what the OP is about. So they should do it right.

Also, please refrain from snide remarks, per HN commenting guidelines. Let your arguments stand on their merits.

link
Gorbzel 2387 days ago
Apple is not inserting itself as law enforcement, nor does your comment provide any justification as for why you think that'd be the case here.

Now, I could point out that absent any rationale, your comment fails to make the conversation "more thoughtful and substantive", as requested per HN commenting guidelines. However, I'd also remind everyone that HN isn't moderated by replying to comments you feel break the guidelines. Quite the opposite: "don't feed egregious comments by replying," if you really believe a comment is that bad then flag it.

However, said guidelines also remind us that critical comments are teaching moments and can be inherently good. Wit is frequently a valuable component in criticism, and there's a different between wit and mean-spirited snark. Thus, we're left with maybe the most important guideline: Assume good faith. I genuinely believe the article OP is well-intentioned, and was hoping the comment parent would provide some additional justification or perhaps reflection based on the distinction between good ideas and BigTech overreach. Instead, meta-commentary.

Regardless, have a good day.

link