[ajuc]

USA has 12.21 gun-related deaths per 100,000 population per year. It's 10th highest in the world, and all the countries higher up aren't considered developed.

19th highest in the world is Argentina and it has less than half the deaths US has.

In top 30 there are countries with less than 1/4th the deaths.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-r...

[tinalumfoil]

The US homicide rate is the 94th globally [0]. Looking at "gun related deaths" is misleading because it includes suicides, which in the US is very high. The vast majority die from disease so if the goal is to prevent premature death a marginal improvement to US healthcare system would save far more people than whatever this high school surveillance state is trying to accomplish.

That's not a reason not to implement these policies but infringing on privacy, which should be considered a fundamental right, for an at best insignificant decrease in the homicide rate is.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intenti...

[ajuc]

> it includes suicides, which in the US is very high

I wonder why :)

Have you considered the possibility that easy access to guns make suicides more common?

[sdinsn]

> 12.21 gun-related deaths

Which includes suicides & accidents.

It also ignores the overall homicide rate, which is much more important. Do dead people care whether they are murdered with a gun or a knife?

[ajuc]

> suicides & accidents.

Which are more common when the access to guns is easier.

> Do dead people care whether they are murdered with a gun or a knife?

Deaths caused by guns are easily preventable. Why not prevent them?

[sdinsn]

> Which are more common when the access to guns is easier.

Again, you are ignoring all the countries that have strict gun control laws and still have high rates of suicides.

> Deaths caused by guns are easily preventable

They clearly aren't, since there is no correlation between gun control laws and homicides.