[devhwrng]

Great paper! Given the write-ups of old and broken crypto, perhaps a better title would be History of Cryptography?

[ljhsiung]

It does say at the top "originally written in 1998" and it was basically amended over time, but regardless I still love learning about "historical" views.

Example: A textbook from '95 had a pretty large section on "the future" of ECC and "current" trends in research. It was interesting seeing what came true, or what was still being worked on.

[FabHK]

Indeed. Interesting mix of theory ("here's how RSA works and why") and practice (list of specs and RFCs), but very old-school.

Today, I'd expect less focus on RSA and PGP, and instead a mention of elliptic curves, the Signal protocol (double ratchet), etc.