| While some codes of conduct boil down to "just be nice", sometimes they end up encoding very specific beliefs of the people writing them. For example, the code of conduct on dev.to [1] states that: ------------- We pledge to prioritize marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding: ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’ Reasonable communication of boundaries, such as 'leave me alone,' 'go away,' or 'I’m not discussing this with you.' Someone’s refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts Criticisms of racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions ------------- Note the "we will not act on complaints regarding [...] reverse racism". As someone who 100% disagrees with the idea that "reverse racism" is a thing (although I find the word dumb; it's just plain racism, nothing "reverse" about it) I have to ask myself: Does this mean the rules differ based on skin colour? Is something acceptable when said by a black user to a white user, but racism if it's the other way around? It's things like these that, I believe, end up turning a "code of conduct" into a de facto political manifesto designed to keep out not only unwanted behavior, but also unwanted world-views. It's those codes of conduct that create direct harm. [1] https://dev.to/code-of-conduct |