[kingosticks]

> Because what if it's not?

Then, after you done ruling out the most likely and easiest explanation to test, you can then start exploring the remaining possibilities. Skipping to the more exotic explanations sounds more interesting but it's poor use of time if there's still low-hanging fruit out there.

[baq]

maybe, with high frequency radios and improperly shielded cables and chips, the most likely scenario is RF interference?

[kingosticks]

Improper shielding is an assumption with no evidence as yet. I also mentioned that the ease of verifying the explanation should be a factor. Changing software is usually very easy.

[markus92]

It's so common that it's not an unlikely starting point. EMC is a major issue in high frequency electronics design and the raspberry pi had a history of having to redesign certain parts because of not having enough shielding.

[kingosticks]

I can find [1] on the subject which is quite interesting.

[1]: https://www.element14.com/community/people/PeteL/blog/2012/0...

[markus92]

See also https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/tag/ce-compliance/

[kingosticks]

There doesn't seem to be much info on compliance out there for Pi 4 which must have been significantly different w.r.t HDMI.

[mlyle]

https://twitter.com/assortedhackery/status/12000566338980290...

Evidence :P

[baq]

wrapping tinfoil around an hdmi plug/cable isn't particularly hard either :) chips are harder but at least you rule out the cable. HDMI cables are ridiculously finicky if you've ever tried to get anything more than the lowest common denominator 1080p going on them.

[kingosticks]

I don't agree that wrapping foil is a great way to 100% rule that out as there is room for error. Using different cables/dongles would be better and they already tried that.