|
|
|
|
|
by eggie
2398 days ago
|
|
> neurons appear to serve as both CPU and memory storage I'm not sure this is really certain. But that uncertainty is more because it's hard to prove that there isn't another means of recording memory than something we know. There has been speculation that there might be some genetic or biopolymer based system in the hippocampus, but I'm not familiar with anything more than speculation on that topic. |
|
For me, an analogy that is quite adequate in computer science would be LUTs in an FPGA: they are memory+compute units, and can be used as both.
To go a bit further, any memory could indeed be considered a computation unit, or vice-versa: consider a results cache, for instance. The difference I see between memory and computation is that memory accesses are, if not instantaneous, at least constant-time. If you want more precision, this can be computed: the necessary memory footprint is extended trough time as well as space (if you only use a results LUT, you'd have to make it bigger to gain precision).